Remote Working and Potential Violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act

Remote Working and Potential Violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act

Introduction: The advent of remote working has brought about significant changes to the traditional workplace dynamic. With the increasing prevalence of remote work arrangements, it is essential to consider the potential implications for labor laws and regulations. One notable concern is the potential for violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA), a key piece of Federal legislation designed to protect workers’ rights. This article explores the challenges and potential violations that may arise in the context of remote work and how employers and employees can ensure compliance with the FLSA.

1. Misclassification of Employees: One of the primary areas where violations of the FLSA can occur in remote work arrangements is the misclassification of employees. Employers must correctly classify workers as either employees or independent contractors, as this determination significantly affects their entitlement to certain labor protections. Misclassifying employees as independent contractors can lead to violations of the FLSA, as independent contractors are exempt from many of the act’s provisions.

2. Overtime and Compensation: Another area of concern in remote work is ensuring proper compensation for overtime hours worked. Under the FLSA, non-exempt employees are entitled to receive overtime pay at a rate of at least one and a half times their regular hourly wage for any hours worked beyond 40 hours in a workweek. The challenge with remote work is accurately tracking and recording employees’ hours, particularly when they have flexible schedules or engage in off-the-clock work. Failure to accurately account for and compensate for overtime can result in FLSA violations.

 

3. Off-the-Clock Work: Remote work may blur the boundaries between work and personal life, leading to potential violations of the FLSA’s regulations regarding off-the-clock work. Employers must ensure that employees are not performing work-related tasks outside their designated work hours without proper compensation. Answering work emails or attending virtual meetings after hours, for example, should be considered as work time and compensated accordingly to comply with the FLSA.

4. Meal and Rest Breaks: The FLSA mandates that employers provide meal and rest breaks to non-exempt employees. However, remote work arrangements may lead to challenges in ensuring that employees are taking appropriate breaks. Employers must communicate clear policies to remote workers regarding their entitlement to breaks and provide mechanisms for tracking and documenting these breaks. Failure to provide employees with adequate breaks can result in FLSA violations.

5. Record keeping: Accurate record keeping is crucial for FLSA compliance, but it becomes more challenging in remote work scenarios. Employers must etablish robust systems to track employees’ work hours, breaks, and any other relevant information to ensure compliance with the FLSA. Proper record keeping helps resolve disputes and provides evidence of compliance in case of an audit or investigation.

Conclusion: While remote work offers numerous benefits for both employees and employers, it is important to address the potential violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act that may arise. Employers must ensure that remote workers are properly classified, accurately compensated for overtime, not performing off-the-clock work, provided with adequate breaks, and maintain thorough record keeping. By addressing these concerns, employers can navigate the complexities of remote work while upholding their legal obligations under the FLSA, ensuring fair treatment of employees, and mitigating the risk of labor law violations. If you believe your employer may not be fully compensating you for your time, call Mark Wolfe at 251 410-7761 or send an email to mark@brwlawyers.com and put “employment compensation?” in the subject line.

REQUIRED DISCLAIMERS: Alabama Rule of Professional Conduct 7.2: No representation is made that the quality of legal service to be performed is greater than the services provided by other lawyers. The Mississippi Supreme Court advises that a decision on legal services is important and should not be based solely on advertisements. Free background information is available upon request to a Mississippi attorney. The listing of any area of practice by a Mississippi attorney does not indicate any certification of expertise therein. See Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.2(d), Rule 7.4(a), Rule 7.6(a) (1997). Statement in compliance with Florida Bar Advertising Rules: “The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience. [Florida Rule 4-7.2(d)]. General Disclaimer: This information is posted for general information purposes to help those interested parties or persons with potential civil claims better understand their rights and potential causes of action. If readers are currently represented by an attorney on the subject matter of this post then they are encouraged to continue with said representation. No attorney-client relationship is established by this post. The above article was written with the assistance of ChatGPT.

 

Water Supply Contamination Claims

PFAS Contamination in Our Water Supply?

Per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are a group of man-made chemicals that have been used in industry and consumer products worldwide since the 1950s. They are found in m

any everyday products, including food packaging, textiles, and non-stick cookware. PFAS can enter the environment through manufacturing facilities, airports, and military installations where firefighting foam containing PFAS was used. These chemicals are persistent in the environment and can accumulate in the human body over time.  According to an analysis by the Environmental Working Group (EWG), an independent research and consumer watchdog organization pushing to limit exposure to chemicals through water, food and household products, some level of PFAS have been found in water samples of 2,790 communities across 49 statesMore recent testing found high PFAS levels in drinking water in 34 major US citiesSome researchers say nearly every source of surface water in the country is contaminated.

The EPA has not established national drinking water regulations for PFAS.  However, in 2022 the EPA revised its health advisory to conclude that some negative health effects may occur with concentrations of PFAs substances in water that are below the EPA’s ability to detect at this time. The lower the level of PFAs substances, the lower the risk to public health. For information regarding Alabama Department of Environmental Management’s recent testing of the state’s water supply:  https://adem.alabama.gov/programs/water/drinkingwater/files/AllPFASResults.pdf

Numerous lawsuits have been filed against PFAs manufacturers.  The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation has consolidated and centralized these lawsuits in an MDL (Multidistrict Litigatio

n), and appointed U.S. District Judge Richard M. Gergel to preside over coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings out of the District of South Carolina. You may be eligible to file a lawsuit for PFAs exposure.  Currently, Boteler Richardson Wolfe is representing clients who:

  • Received a diagnosis of testicular or kidney cancer since 2000.
  • Drank from a contaminated water supply from 1990 to present for over six months. (Each claimant must be able to establish exposure to the contaminated water supply).

If you have any questions regarding your eligibility, call us @ 251.433.7766.

REQUIRED DISCLAIMERS: Alabama Rule of Professional Conduct 7.2: No representation is made that the quality of legal service to be performed is greater than the services provided by other lawyers. The Mississippi Supreme Court advises that a decision on legal services is important and should not be based solely on advertisements. Free background information is available upon request to a Mississippi attorney. The listing of any area of practice by a Mississippi attorney does not indicate any certification of expertise therein. See Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.2(d), Rule 7.4(a), Rule 7.6(a) (1997). Statement in compliance with Florida Bar Advertising Rules: “The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience. [Florida Rule 4-7.2(d)]. General Disclaimer: This information is posted for general information purposes to help those interested parties or persons with potential civil claims better understand their rights and potential causes of action. If readers are currently represented by an attorney on the subject matter of this post then they are encouraged to continue with said representation. No attorney-client relationship is established by this post.

Hair Relaxer Lawsuits

Hair Relaxers

A recent study by the National Institutes of Health found that women who used hair straightening products more than four times in the previous year were twice as likely to develop uterine cancer than those who did not use them. The study noted that approximately 60 percent of the participants who reported using straighteners in the previous year were self-identified Black women. The researchers did not collect information on brands or ingredients in the hair products the women used. However, they noted the presence of several chemicals found in straighteners (such as parabens, phthalates, bisphenol A, metals and formaldehyde) that could be contributing to the increased uterine cancer risk observed. “We estimated that 1.64% of women who never used hair straighteners would go on to develop uterine cancer by the age of 70; but for frequent users, that risk goes up to 4.05%,” said Alexandra White, PhD, head of the NIEHS Environment and Cancer Epidemiology group and lead author of the study.

Soon after the study was released, many users of the hair relaxer products filed lawsuits against the manufacturers such as L’Oreal and Revlon throughout the county. Several of these lawsuits have noted that the risks of developing cancer are more substantial among Black women, who make up the overwhelming majority of consumers of hair relaxing products. The U.S. Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation decided earlier this year to consolidate and centralize all hair relaxer cancer lawsuits in an MDL (Multidistrict Litigation), and appointed U.S. District Judge Mary M. Rowland to preside over coordinated discovery and pretrial proceedings out of the Northern District of Illinois.

Boteler Richardson Wolfe is pursuing product liability claims to file in the North District of Illinois against hair straightener and hair relaxer manufacturers. If you used a hair straightener and/or relaxer products and have received a diagnosis of uterine cancer or ovarian cancer, you may have a potential claim. Please call us at 251.433.7766 for a free consultation.

REQUIRED DISCLAIMERS: Alabama Rule of Professional Conduct 7.2: No representation is made that the quality of legal service to be performed is greater than the services provided by other lawyers. The Mississippi Supreme Court advises that a decision on legal services is important and should not be based solely on advertisements. Free background information is available upon request to a Mississippi attorney. The listing of any area of practice by a Mississippi attorney does not indicate any certification of expertise therein. See Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.2(d), Rule 7.4(a), Rule 7.6(a) (1997). Statement in compliance with Florida Bar Advertising Rules: “The hiring of a lawyer is an important decision that should not be based solely upon advertisements. Before you decide, ask us to send you free written information about our qualifications and experience. [Florida Rule 4-7.2(d)]. General Disclaimer: This information is posted for general information purposes to help those interested parties or persons with potential civil claims better understand their rights and potential causes of action. If readers are currently represented by an attorney on the subject matter of this post then they are encouraged to continue with said representation. No attorney-client relationship is established by this post.