False Claims Act – Whistleblower Claims

by Mark Wolfe, Attorney at Law In 1863 the U.S. Government enacted the False Claims Actscales and gavel (FCA) as a way to stop and discourage fraud by companies who were selling war supplies to the Union Army during the civil war. It authorizes private citizens with “inside information” to bring a lawsuit on the government’s behalf against a person or business who has fraudulently or wrongly caused the Federal government to suffer a financial loss.

To encourage courageous individuals to step forward and report fraud the FCA provides that the individual who first comes forward and files the claim is rewarded with anywhere from 15- 30% of the government’s recovery! It also allows the person reporting the fraud or initiating the claim investigation to remain anonymous during the preliminary investigation and prevents retaliation once the action is formally started in Court.

These type of claims and cases have been increasing and in 2011, the Federal government recovered over $3 billion and paid almost $530 million to the individual whistleblowers who initiated these actions. Some examples of these type claims include:

– Billing for goods or services that were not provided or that were unnecessary.

– Falsifying certifications, test results, research data, safety reports, and/or product quality.

– Securing contracts through misrepresentation, kickbacks or bribes.

– Misuse or misappropriation of Federal grant funds.

– Duplicate or multiple billing for the same goods or services.

Many States, and some larger municipalities, have also enacted similar FCA laws to protect State and local governments from fraud. Alabama has not enacted FCA laws; however, if a State agency receives Federal funds it is possible a FCA claim can be maintained if the fraudulent loss is passed through the State agency back to the Federal funding. Initial reporting requirements for these type claims can be complex and tedious and may require further investigation and analysis before being presented to the Federal government for review. If you have inside knowledge or information about fraud against the Federal government and want legal help and guidance for the claim, we can help. Consultations are free and confidential. Call 433-7766 or e-mail me at mark@brwlawyers.com 

    REQUIRED DISCLAIMERS Alabama Rule of Professional Conduct 7.2: No representation is made that the quality of legal service to be performed is greater than the services provided by other lawyers. The Mississippi Supreme Court advises that a decision on legal services is important and should not be based solely on advertisements. Free Background information is available upon request to a Mississippi attorney. The listing of any area of practice by a Mississippi attorney does not indicate any certification of expertise therein. See Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.2(d), Rule 7.4(a), Rule 7.6(a) (1997). General Disclaimer: This information is posted for general information purposes to help those interested parties or persons with potential civil claims better understand their rights and potential causes of action. If readers are currently represented by an attorney on the subject matter of this post then they are encouraged to continue with said representation. No attorney-client relationship is established by this post.

Using Your Smart Phone at the Accident Scene

by Personal Injury Attorney Mark Wolfe, mark@bfw-lawyers.com

After you have notified authorities of the accident you can use your smart phone to document important details about the accident. This information can be critical and is often not adequately captured by a simple written accident report.

Photograph the Following at the Scene: -Property damage, including interior photos of deployed airbags or other interior damage such as structural damage to a seat. Take lots of photos from multiple angles.smartphone image – Other driver’s proof of insurance card, registration and driver’s license. This is much easier than trying write down the information! – The accident scene including where the vehicles ended up after the collision and any skid marks or road gouge marks. Also, if there is a traffic sign such as a stop sign that is important, i.e., the other driver ran a stop sign, get a photo or two of it also. – Take photos of your injuries.

Video the Following at the Scene: – Video statements from witnesses. Make sure they give their full name, address and telephone number in addition to stating what they observed. If they are camera shy, ask them if they’ll at least give you a recorded statement via the audio recorder on your phone. – If a traffic light is part of the accident scene, you may want to video the sequence of the traffic light to show it was functioning correctly. – If the other driver is acting strange or suspicious at the scene or you suspect they have been drinking or under the influence, you may want to capture video of them at the scene. WARNING: Use good judgment with this suggestion. You do not want to elevate an already stressful situation into a confrontation with the other driver.

REQUIRED DISCLAIMERS

Alabama Rule of Professional Conduct 7.2: No representation is made that the quality of legal service to be performed is greater than the services provided by other lawyers. The Mississippi Supreme Court advises that a decision on legal services is important and should not be based solely on advertisements. Free background information is available upon request to a Mississippi attorney. The listing of any area of practice by a Mississippi attorney does not indicate any certification of expertise therein. See Mississippi Rules of Professional Conduct Rule 7.2(d), Rule 7.4(a), Rule 7.6(a) (1997). General Disclaimer: This information is posted for general information purposes to help those interested parties or persons with potential civil claims better understand their rights and potential causes of action. If readers are currently represented by an attorney on the subject matter of this post then they are encouraged to continue with said representation. No attorney-client relationship is established by this post.

Is Your Homeowners Insurance Company Really on Your Side?

When you purchase a homeowners insurance policy, you make a substantial financial commitment to your insurer. In return, you expect it to hold up its end of the bargain and provide coverage for certain types of damage to your home. Sadly, homeowners insurance companies often act against their policyholders’ interests. Here are just a few recent examples: Hurricane Katrina In the wake of Hurricane Katrina, thousands of policyholders’ claims were denied on the premise that their homes were exclusively damaged by water. Since flood damage isn’t covered by many policies, this was enough to ruin many hardworking homeowners. In cases that clearly involved wind damage, insurers went even further and argued that standard homeowners policies were insufficient to cover “dual damages.” Many residents successfully sued to have these decisions reversed. Hurricane Sandy While standard homeowners insurance policies don’t cover flood damage, homeowners who had supplemental flood insurance policies were sure that they’d be covered after Hurricane Sandy. Unfortunately, tens of thousands of claims in New York and New Jersey were denied on the basis that flood-related damage was caused by groundwater rather than surface floods. Many policyholders who sought advice from licensed attorneys in the wake of the storm were able to challenge these questionable denials of coverage. Northridge Earthquake In some cases, insurers resort to outright fraud. After a major earthquake in the Los Angeles area, some policy issuers simply forged homeowners’ signatures on coverage waivers to avoid paying claims. Needless to say, this was not an acceptable maneuver. Many homeowners who enlisted the help of trained legal professionals were able to mount successful court challenges to their insurers’ underhanded tactics. “Mundane” Denials In all of the situations that we described above, insurance companies were motivated by the threat of heavy financial losses to disregard their policyholders and deny legitimate claims. Unfortunately, the same principles apply to individual claims. Since burst pipes, tree damage and other “mundane” issues don’t make headlines, insurance companies might actually be more inclined to deny individual homeowners’ claims on such matters. Homeowners insurance companies deny all manner of claims, but the most commonly ignored include water damage and structural problems like roof deterioration or “settling.” For water-related claims, insurance companies often attempt to argue that the source of a damaging inundation is external and thus isn’t covered by traditional homeowner’s insurance. For structural problems caused by storms or faulty construction, insurers may point to the policy’s vaguely defined “wear and tear” clause. If you’re fed up with homeowner’s insurance companies that don’t respect their policyholders, you need an experienced attorney who knows the insurance business through and through. Learn more about your options at our website or call us at 866-975-7766.

How Can an Honest Disability Claim Be Denied?

If you become unable to work due to a mental or physical health condition, you may be entitled to file a disability claim online or at your nearest Social Security Administration office. There’s a tremendous amount of publicly available literature about the filing process, but ensuring that your honest disability claim is accepted might not be as easy as it sounds. We’ll discuss why some honest claims are denied and offer some friendly advice about fighting for your right to disability insurance. What Are the Basic Criteria for a Legitimate Disability Claim? While claims for disability insurance are always evaluated on a case-by-case basis, there are a few key criteria that applicants are expected to meet. These usually include: •    An inability to perform Substantial Gainful Activity (SGA) or earn more than $1,040 per month at a regular job •    A qualifying medical condition that prevents reasonable work activity •    Doctor-prescribed restrictions on physical activity, including limitations on standing, lifting or walking •    An inability to fulfill the duties of the applicant’s most recent job Why Some Claims Are Denied Honest disability claims can be denied for a variety of reasons. In far too many cases, applicants simply aren’t aware that they have to file specific pieces of paperwork or meet specified deadlines. In others, they change residences and can’t be reached by Social Security Administration employees. Other common reasons include: •    Past criminal convictions •    Missing or incomplete records •    Misunderstandings that result in a failure to meet therapy guidelines •    A disability that’s determined to be temporary If your disability claim has been denied for any of these reasons, a trained legal professional can help you navigate the treacherous waters of the appeals process. How to Appeal Appealing a denied disability claim is much easier with proper representation. You’ll need to inform the proper authorities of your desire to appeal within 60 days of receiving your denial. Additionally, you’ll need to attend a special hearing and speak directly with a judge. If your initial appeal is denied, you can lodge another appeal with the state’s Appeals Council or take the matter to federal court. Success Rates and the Benefits of Professional Representation In Alabama, just 30% of initial disability claims are approved. Upon appeal, approval rates roughly double. This underscores the importance of hiring a legal professional to guide you through the claims and appeals processes. Our team of disability insurance specialists knows the ins and outs of Alabama’s confusing legal framework and is proud to fight for their clients’ rights. For more information about contesting a denied disability claim or any of the other services that our Mobile, AL law firm offers, visit our homepage or call 866-975-7766.

Why Representing Yourself in a Disability Hearing Is Dangerous

You may think that you can navigate the disability process on your own; however, statistics show that claimants with representation during a Social Security disability (SSD) hearing win twice as often as claimants without representation. Here are five scenarios faced by disability do-it-yourselfers that may cause unnecessary problems: 1. Technical Errors If you miss the appeals deadline or if you fail to gather the correct documentation, you could lose even the most clear-cut disability case. An experienced attorney knows the appeal procedures, makes sure that you meet your deadlines and helps you to gather all of your documentation. 2. Missing Paperwork Assembling all of the information that you need for a disability hearing isn’t easy. You need documents including Social Security Administration (SSA) forms, medical records, employer’s statements and additional physician opinions. Your attorney can make sure that you have all of the paperwork that you need to support your case. 3. Lack of Preparation Questions asked during your hearing can throw you off guard. When you’re nervous, you may leave out critical information. Your attorney can anticipate the administrative law judge’s (ALJ) questions as well as any questions that may be asked by the SSA’s vocational expert. A good attorney will review these questions, help you to formulate complete answers and rehearse with you before the date of your hearing. Another advantage of hiring an attorney is that your lawyer will be familiar with the local hearings process. Your attorney may know the judges and their individual styles well enough to help you tailor your case in a winning way. 4. Financial Difficulties When you’re unable to work because of a disability, you may live off of savings, unemployment or workers’ compensation benefits for a while; however, if the appeals process drags out for a long time, you may run out of money to support yourself and your family. Your attorney can ensure that you follow appeals procedures to the letter. With your attorney’s help, you can avoid delays that can leave you even more financially strapped. 5. Exhaustion The Disability Determination Services may take between three and five months to process your application. After you appeal, you may have to wait over a year for your hearing. Disability claims can be a long slog, and it’s easy to feel like giving up. Your attorney will advocate for you, reassure you and work to secure a quick date for your appeals hearing. Contact Boteler, Finley & Wolfe to work with an experienced Mobile, AL disability attorney. Don’t put yourself through unnecessary stress. Call us today.

Estate of Pierce v. Monumental Life Ins Co., Claim Number 07003142

Type of Case: Wrongful Denial of Life Insurance Benefits Facts: This claim involved a denial of accidental death benefits. After Mr. Pierce was killed in a motorcycle accident, his family made a claim for accidental death benefits under a life insurance policy issued by Monumental Life Insurance Company. The claim was denied based upon an “exclusion” in the policy. BF&W was retained by the family to investigate the denial of benefits. Mark Wolfe asked that the denial of benefits be reconsidered and he submitted supporting documents and legal citations which clearly showed the exclusionary provision cited by the company in its original denial was not applicable based upon the facts of the underlying accident. After reconsideration, the benefits were paid in full without need of litigation.

F&S Marine LLC v. Indemnity Insurance Company of NA, et al., CV 2009-900715

Type of Case: Wrongful Denial of Insurance Benefits Facts: This insurance benefit case involved a significant loss claim for F&S Marine LLC (F&S) at a shipyard job site in South Carolina. F&S submitted the claim for the loss and it was denied because the insurance company claimed F&S was not covered for the loss. Mark Wolfe of BF&W was retained by F&S to investigate and prosecute this matter. Pre-litigation attempts at resolution were not successful and a lawsuit was filed. Shortly after filing the lawsuit, a confidential settlement was reached in the matter.

Estate of Rose Clark v. Hartford Life Insurance Company, Claim Number: ADD-10900 49-59141

Type of Case: Wrongful Denial of Life Insurance Benefits Facts: This claim involved the denial of accidental death benefits. Ms. Clark died from a cerebral hemorrhage ten days after she had a fall at her house. At the hospital, and before her death, medical personnel indicated to her family that the cerebral hemorrhage appeared to be trauma related. Based upon these observations and comments, her daughters who were beneficiaries under an accidental death policy issued by Hartford, submitted a claim. After six months the claim was denied by Hartford because their adjuster did not believe the cerebral hemorrhage was of an “accidental origin.” Mark Wolfe of BF&W was retained to prosecute the appeal of the denied benefits. In support of the appeal, BF&W submitted a full set of relevant medical records including the digital CT scan related to the cerebral hemorrhage as well as affidavits from a radiologist and a neurosurgeon. Both doctors testified that based upon the medical records and the CT scan, the cerebral hemorrhage was of traumatic origin and consistent with a head trauma. After reviewing the documents and material submitted by BF&W, Hartford reversed its previous denial and paid the full amount of life insurance benefits owed along with accrued interest.

Gradford v. Nicholas Concrete

Type of Case: Personal Injury & Workers Compensation Facts: Mark Wolfe took over the appeal of this case after a jury returned a verdict in favor of the Defendant. (The lawyer who had represented the vicim at trial did not want to file an appeal.) The case was reversed and remanded by the Alabama Supreme Court based upon an incorrect jury charge and was settled in mediation for $220,000.00 in advance of the new trial.  Read the full opinion here.

Voivedich v. Douglas CV 01-1630

Type of Case: Motor Vehicle Collision Facts: This case involved a motorcycle collision with a small farm tractor. The accident happened when Mr. Voivedich ran his motorcycle into the back of a small farm tractor being operated by the Defendant on a rural Mobile County road. Mr. Voivedich received extensive injuries including the loss of part of his right foot. There was a dispute as to the lighting conditions at the time of the accident. The tractor was being operated without any lights or reflective warning devices but the Defendant contended that it was dusk and there was enough light that Mr. Voivedich should have seen the tractor. Mr. Voivedich stated it was dark at the time of the accident and his testimony was later verified by an independent witness. The case then settled for the full policy limits of the Defendant, $301,000.00. Mark Wolfe handled the case for the firm.